.

0 (hodnocen0 x )

EB

EB

ONLINE

Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017

1 online zdroj

ISBN 978-3-319-48063-3 (e-kniha)

ISBN 978-3-319-48062-6 (print)

This book provides a state of the art approach to participatory planning, and generates innovative thought in planning theory and knowledge study. The book introduces a new conceptual framework for participatory planning, one which redefines concepts that have been taken for granted for too long: those of “public participation” and “local knowledge”. It draws on the rich repertoire of public participation practices that have developed globally over the last 50 years, and investigates the following questions: Which participatory practices most effectively capture residents’ genuine spatial needs, perceptions and desires? And how can these be incorporated into actual plans? The book is based on an empirical comparative examination of the effectiveness of various participatory processes, and proposes practical solutions for public participation through two new instruments: the Practices Evaluation Tool, and the Participatory Methods Ladder. These instruments calibrate participation methods according to certain criteria, in order to improve their ability to extract local knowledge and incorporate it into planning deliverables. These new instruments correspond to and elaborate on Arnstein’s ladder - the 1969 theoretical landmark for participatory planning. Both academics and practitioners in the area of urban and regional planning will find this book to be an invaluable resource, given the way it develops both theoretical and practical cutting-edge outcomes..

001476010

1 Abstract 1 // 2 Introduction 7 // 3 Conceptual Context ? // 3.1 Local Knowledge 11 // 3.2 Extracting Local Knowledge 14 // 3.3 Public Participation and the Planning Process 18 // 3.3.1 The Transition to the Postmodern Era 18 // 3.3.2 The Transition to Participatory Planning 19 // 3.4 Public Participation and Civil Society 22 // 3.5 Methods of Public Participation 25 // 3.6 Public Participation in Israel 30 // 4 Research Methodology 35 // 4.1 Research Sample 35 // 4.2 Methodology’s Conceptual Context 37 // 4.3 Research Activities 39 // 5 Test Case: The Planning Process of Haifa’s [Carmel] Range // Artery 45 // 5.1 Introduction 45 // 5.2 Collaborative Public Participation 47 // 5.2.1 Haifa’s Environmental Traumas 47 // 5.2.2 Oraním [“Pines”] Tower 47 // 5.2.3 The Commercialization of Moriah Boulevard 51 // 5.2.4 Kiryát Sčfer Tower 55 // 5.3 Unilateral Public Participation 57 // 5.3.1 Introduction 57 // 5.3.2 Criteria Prioritization via the Letter 57 // x Contents // 5.3.3 The SWOT Model 59 // 5.3.4 Alternatives Selection: Choosing Between Planning // Alternatives 62 // 5.4 Incorporating Local Knowledge into the City Master Plan 63 // 6 Test Case: The Planning Process of Tel Aviv’s Shlavim Artery 67 // 6.1 Introduction 67 // 6.2 Collaborative Public Participation 69 // 6.2.1 South Tel Aviv’s Environmental Traumas 69 // 6.2.2 The South Neve Tzedek “Contiguity” Plan 70 // 6.2.3 The Shlavim Artery 72 // 6.3 Unilateral Public Participation 78 // 6.3.1 Introduction 78 // 6.3.2 Criteria Prioritization 79 // 6.3.3 Alternatives Selection: Choosing Between Planning // Alternatives 80 // 6.3.4 The SWOT Model 83 // 6.4 Incorporating Local Knowledge into the City Master Plan 85 // 7 Evaluation of the Participation Methods’ Effectiveness 91 // 7.1 The Motivators for Public Participation Processes 91 //

7.2 Public Notification of Public Participation Processes 93 // 7.3 Procedures and Tools in Public Participation Processes 99 // 7.4 Enlistment of Stakeholders 105 // 7.5 The Interaction Among Stakeholders 108 // 7.6 Exposure of Local Knowledge 112 // 7.7 Scope and Depth of Local Knowledge 121 // 7.8 Characteristics of Local Knowledge 133 // 7.9 Processing Local Knowledge and Obtaining Public // Participation Deliverables 136 // 7.10 Incorporation of Local Knowledge into Planning Deliverables 142 // 7.11 Outcomes and Conclusions Derived from the Analysis // of Findings 145 // 7.11.1 Interrelations Among Criteria of Participatory // Processes 145 // 7.11.2 Evaluation Parameters (Evaluation Tool) 146 // 7.11.3 Participatory Procedures Classification 148 // 7.11.4 Superiority of Anthropological Tools in Exposing Local Knowledge 152 // 8 Discussion: Comparison of Methods of Public Participation 155 // 8.1 Public Participation as a Way of Amassing Operative Professional Knowledge 155 // 8.2 Public Participation as a Practice that Precedes // and Advances Consensus on Planning Deliverables 159 // 8.3 Public Participation as a Way of Building Social Capital // and Advancing Sustainability 162 // 8.4 Public Participation as a Means of Strengthening // Civil Society 170 // 9 Public Participation: Between Theory and Practice 175 // 10 Summary of Outcomes and Conclusions 199 // References 209